Should pupils be urged to criticize and evaluate teachers to improve teaching and learning quality? This is certainly an interesting but controversial issue. I believe that these kinds of approach will not be the right issue, and other factors may have to be taken into consideration.
Individuals who support students' criticism or perhaps evaluation of teacher often argue that this kind of efforts can lead to a noticable difference in educating and learning quality. Their very own reasoning is the fact under pressure instructors will have to function harder and produce effects. On the one hand, there is no hard evidence in support of their thinking. On the other hand, students' random or perhaps nonconstructive critique and evaluation of a teacher's work could be counterproductive, triggering a lack of respect and discipline inside the class.
I really believe that in the event the major goal is to improve the quality of teaching or learning, many things must be done. Teacher's operating conditions have to be improved 1st. Better settlement packages ought to be made available, and training opportunities offered. Traditions is an important stuff which must be considered before deciding whether or not to desire students to assess a teacher's performance. Even in the west with firm standing customs of democracy, such an way may not work: the face and respect of the teacher are generally too essential variables to ignore; while in Hard anodized cookware nations exactly where democratic techniques are just starting to flourish, time has not arrive to do it. The students can turn dysfunctional where the educator is no longer well known.
In conclusion, although it is luring to allow students' critical assessment of a teacher's work, such an idea should not be encouraged, plus the cultural factor need to be tackled, as well